Volume: 26, Issue: 09 (2014)
PUBLIC RULING BR PUB 14/06: PAYMENTS MADE BY PARENTS OR GUARDIANS OF STUDENTS TO STATE SCHOOLS - GST TREATMENT
Description: The Arrangement is the payment of amounts (whether described as 'school fees', 'voluntary contributions', 'activity fees' or otherwise) by parents or guardians of pupils who are enrolled at a State school (including schools integrated within the state system of education under the Private Schools Conditional Integration Act 1975) and who are not international students under the Education Act 1989 to the Board of Trustees of such a school. Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_001
Feedback
|
PRODUCT RULING BR PRD 14/06: ENGAGEMENT OF SUPERVISORS BY PMP DISTRIBUTION
Description: This Ruling has been applied for by PMP Distribution Limited (PMP Distribution) Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_002
Feedback
|
PRODUCT RULING BR PRD 14/07: NEW ZEALAND MAORI ARTS AND CRAFTS INSTITUTE SCHOLARSHIP
Description: This Ruling has been applied for by PMP Distribution Limited (PMP Distribution)
Categories:
BINDING RULING
SCHOLARSHIP
Referenced Entities:
Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_003
Feedback
|
FBT RATE FOR LOW-INTEREST LOANS INCREASES
Description: The prescribed rate of interest used to calculate fringe benefit tax on low-interest, employment-related loans is 6.70%, up from the previous rate of 6.13% which applied from the quarter beginning 1 July 2014. Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_004
Feedback
|
QB 14/09: INCOME TAX - MEANING OF 'EXCESSIVE REMUNERATION' AND 'EXCESSIVE PROFITS OR LOSSES' PAID OR ALLOCATED TO RELATIVES, PARTNERS, SHAREHOLDERS OR DIRECTORS
Description: This Question We've Been Asked (QWBA) is about ss GB 23, GB 24, GB 25 and GB 25B. It explains the meaning of 'excessive remuneration', 'excessive profits or losses' and 'excessive amount arising from the application of the lookthrough company rules' when they are used in those four sections.
Categories:
DEFINE - EXCESSIVE PROFITS OR LOSSES
DEFINE - EXCESSIVE REMUNERATION
DIRECTOR
PARTNER
RELATIVE
SHAREHOLDER
Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_005
Feedback
|
APPLICATION TO STAY LIQUIDATION PROCEEDINGS
Description: The Court dismissed the defendant's application to stay liquidation proceedings brought by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner'), finding the Commissioner was a creditor for the purposes of recovering tax and further that the application to appoint liquidators was not an abuse of process. Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_006
Feedback
|
APPLICATION BY TRINITY INVESTORS TO STAY LIQUIDATION PROCEEDINGS
Description: Court dismissed the defendant's application to stay liquidation proceedings brought by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner'), finding the Commissioner was a creditor for the purposes of recovering tax and appointing the liquidator did not perpetuate an unlawful order. Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_007
Feedback
|
CASES INVOLVING ALLEGED TAX AVOIDANCE TRANSFERRED TO HIGH COURT AND CONSOLIDATED
Description: The Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner') was successful in having two related cases transferred from the Taxation Review Authority ('TRA') to the High Court. These cases were also consolidated. Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_008
Feedback
|
HIGH COURT GRANTS INTERIM RELIEF UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE JUDICATURE AMENDMENT ACT 1972
Description: The applicant, Mr John George Russell ('Mr Russell') filed a judicial review application against the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner') in relation to her decision not to accept his proposed offers of settlement. Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_009
Feedback
|
APPEAL AGAINST HIGH COURT DECISION AWARDING INDEMNITY COSTS TO THE COMMISSIONER
Description: The Court allowed the appeal overturning Brewer J's cost judgment in Redcliffe Forestry Venture Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2013] NZHC 3411 and replaced the indemnity costs awarded in favour of the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner') with scale costs.
Categories:
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
HOPELESS CASE
INDEMNITY COSTS
Referenced Entities:
Updated: 14 / 06 / 2019
Reference:
2014_26_09_010
Feedback
|
APPEAL BY TRINITY INVESTORS TO SET ASIDE A HIGH COURT DECISION
Description: The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants' appeal from the High Court judgment of Priestly J (Accent Management Ltd v Attorney-General [2013] NZHC 1447, (2013) 26 NZTC 21,020) where he upheld a protest to jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner') and the Attorney-General.
Categories:
FUNCTUS OFFICIO
HEARING AUTHORITY
INDEMNITY COSTS
NULLITY
TRINITY
Referenced Entities:
Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_011
Feedback
|
UNSUCCESSFUL APPEAL BY TRINITY INVESTORS IN RESPECT OF STATUTORY DEMANDS ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER
Description: This matter involved three appeals against High Court decisions dismissing the appellants' applications to set aside statutory demands issued by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner'). The Court of Appeal found that the Commissioner was able to issue statutory demands and dismissed the appeals.
Categories:
CREDITOR
INSOLVENCY
STATUTORY DEMANDS
TRINITY
Referenced Entities:
Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_012
Feedback
|
APPEAL BY TRINITY INVESTORS TO SET ASIDE A HIGH COURT DECISION AND INDEMNITY COSTS AWARD
Description: The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants' application to set aside a High Court judgment of Katz J (Ben Nevis Forestry Ventures Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2013] NZHC 2361, (2013) 26 NZTC 21-032) and upheld the High Court's award of indemnity costs to the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner').
Categories:
BIAS
INDEMNITY COSTS
SETTING ASIDE
TRINITY
Referenced Entities:
Updated:
Reference:
2014_26_09_013
Feedback
|