Volume: 27, Issue: 06 (2015)
SPECIAL DETERMINATION S36: APPLICATION OF THE FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS RULES TO A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
Description: This determination relates to an arrangement (the Project) involving the finance, design, construction and on-going provision of operation and maintenance services in respect of the Facilities by a limited partnership (the Partnership) under a public-private partnership agreement (the Project Agreement) with the Crown. The Holding Partnership will be the sole limited partner in the Partnership, holding 100% of the Partnership Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_001
Feedback
|
SPECIAL DETERMINATION S37: APPLICATION OF THE FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS RULES TO THE D&C PHASE OF A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.
Description: This determination relates to an arrangement (the Project) involving the finance, design, construction and on-going provision of operation and maintenance services in respect of the Facilities by a limited partnership (the Partnership) under a public-private partnership agreement (the Project Agreement) with the Crown. The Holding Partnership will be the sole limited partner in the Partnership, holding 100% of the Partnership. Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_002
Feedback
|
SPECIAL DETERMINATION S38: APPLICATION OF FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS RULES TO LOANS BY NZ DAIRY FARMING TRUSTS TO NEW ZEALAND RESIDENT FARMERS
Description: This determination relates to Loans between an NZ Dairy Farming Trust (the Fund) and New Zealand resident Farmers. Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_003
Feedback
|
QB 15/05: INCOME TAX - INSURANCE - TERM LIFE INSURANCE POLICY TAKEN OUT BY EMPLOYEE WITH EMPLOYER PAYING THE PREMIUMS ON EMPLOYEE'S BEHALF
Description: What is the income tax treatment of a term life insurance policy that is: taken out by an employee (the employee is the policy holder), and the premiums are paid by the employer on the employee's behalf? Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_004
Feedback
|
QB 15/06: INCOME TAX - INSURANCE - TERM LIFE INSURANCE POLICY TAKEN OUT BY EMPLOYER FOR THE BENEFIT OF AN EMPLOYEE
Description: What is the income tax treatment of a term life insurance policy that is taken out by an employer and where an employee (or their spouse, civil union partner, de facto partner or child) is the beneficiary?
Categories:
CHILD
DE FACTO PARTNER
DEFINE - SALARY OR WAGES
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYER
INSURANCE - LIFE
LIFE INSURANCE
SALARY
SPOUSE
WAGES
Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_005
Feedback
|
NOTICE: THE QUESTION WE'VE BEEN ASKED 'LOAN GUARANTOR'S LOSS WHEN GUARANTEE IS CALLED ON DEDUCTIBILITY'
Description: The question we've been asked 'Loan guarantor's loss when guarantee is called on deductibility' (the QWBA) was published in Tax Information Bulletin Vol 7, No 2 (August 1995). The QWBA concerns provisions in Part EH of the Income Tax Act (ITA) 1994. Updated: 15 / 04 / 2019
Reference:
2015_27_06_006
Feedback
|
INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 89K(1) OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION ACT 1994: THE MEANING OF 'AS SOON AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE'
Description: This was a decision of the Taxation Review Authority ('TRA') confirming that the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner') had properly refused to exercise her discretion to accept the disputants' late statements of position ('SOPs') as they were not issued 'as soon as reasonably practicable' as required by s 89K(1) of the Tax Administration Act 1994 ('TAA').
Categories:
ASSESSMENT
DEFINE - AS SOON AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE
STATEMENT OF POSITION (SOP)
Legislation: Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_007
Feedback
|
COURT OF APPEAL DENIES APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEF
Description: The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr John George Russell's ('Mr Russell') application to the Court of Appeal for a stay/grant of interim relief of the Commissioner of Inland Revenue's ('the Commissioner') bankruptcy proceeding Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_008
Feedback
|
HIGH COURT UPHOLDS TAXATION REVIEW AUTHORITY DECISIONS AND STRIKES OUT CHALLENGES FINDING THEM TO BE AN ABUSE OF PROCESS
Description: The High Court struck out the challenge proceedings of Dr Muir and others in relation to assessments for various tax years ranging from 1997 to 2010. The High Court also dismissed appeals against decisions of Judge Barber striking out Dr Muir's challenges for the 1998 to 2006 years and refusing to recall his strike-out decision
Categories:
ABUSE OF PROCESS
MUTUALITY OF INTEREST
PROCESS - ABUSE
STAYED CASE
STRIKE OUT
TEST CASE
TRINITY
Updated:
Reference:
2015_27_06_009
Feedback
|