Kwister Logo - Tax information at your fingertips

Volume: 28, Issue: 09 (2016)

Current Time (NZ)
Thu 16 May 22:50 PM

Stats: Volumes: 8, Issues: 76, Articles: 1421  


Year: 2016, Volume 28, Issue: 09
Find PDF/full article
Previous issue     Next issue  

Order in Council - FIF deemed rate of return set for 2015-16
 
Description: The deemed rate of return for taxing foreign investment fund (FIF) interests is 6.77% for the 2015-16 income year, down from 7.71% for the previous income year.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_001
Feedback

QB 16/07: Income tax - land sale rules - main home and residential exclusions - regular pattern of acquiring and disposing, or building and disposing
 
Description: This Question We've Been Asked (QWBA) provides guidance about when someone selling land will have a 'regular pattern' of transactions that means they cannot use the residential exclusion from ss CB 6 to CB 11, and when someone selling land will have a 'regular pattern' of transactions that means they cannot use the main home exclusion from the 2-year bright-line test.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_002
Feedback

Section CB 6 - date of acquisition of land and intention
 
Description: This is a decision of the Taxation Review Authority ('TRA') finding that, for the purposes of s CB 6 of the Income Tax 2007 ('Act'), a land is acquired earlier than the date of registration. In this case the TRA found that the land at issue was acquired on the date of settlement and the disputant did not have an intention to dispose of the land on that date.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_003
Feedback

Taxation Review Authority finds no taxable activity and upholds the Commissioner's GST reassessments and deregistration
 
Description: This is a decision of the Taxation Review Authority ('TRA') upholding the Commissioner of Inland Revenue's ('the Commissioner') reassessments of the disputants' Goods and Services Tax ('GST') returns. The input tax credit claimed by the disputants was disallowed and the disputants' GST registration was cancelled from the dates that the disputants originally registered on the basis that the disputants did not have a taxable activity.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_004
Feedback

Application of time bar provisions - s 108 and 108B of the Tax Administration Act 1994
 
Description: This is a decision of the Taxation Review Authority on a preliminary time bar issue dismissing the disputant's claim in relation to the application of time bar provisions to the assessments in respect of the disputant's 2001-2005 tax years.

Categories: TIME BAR 

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_005
Feedback

High Court held that the Commissioner's opinion in section 108(2) of the Tax Administration Act 1994 must be determined by the hearing Authority on a de novo basis
 
Description: This is an appeal to the High Court against the Taxation Review Authority's ('TRA') finding that the Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner') was correct to hold the opinion that the appellants' tax returns were fraudulent or wilfully misleading pursuant to s 108(2) of the Tax Administration Act 1994 ('TAA'). The Commissioner cross-appealed the TRA's finding that the appellants had not committed evasion

Categories: LEGAL 

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_006
Feedback

Statutory Interpretation: section CC 1 of the Income Tax Act 2007
 
Description: The Court of Appeal has found that the words 'other revenues' in s CC 1(2) of the Income Tax Act 2007 ('the Act') do not capture amounts that are capital in nature.

Categories: DEFINE - OTHER REVENUES 

Legislation: Referenced Entities:
  • VECTOR LTD
Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_007
Feedback

Impact of bankruptcy on ability to bring challenge proceedings
 
Description: The High Court dismissed an appeal from a Taxation Review Authority ('TRA') decision, upholding the TRA's decision to dismiss a challenge proceeding

Categories: BANKRUPTCY  LEGAL 

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_008
Feedback

Crediting may not constitute payment
 
Description: The High Court held that crediting an amount to a shareholder's current account in respect of an existing liability in circumstances where there were insufficient funds for the shareholder to draw down the full amount, did not constitute payment. Because there was no final payment under the financial arrangement in this case, a base price adjustment ('BPA') was not required.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2016_28_09_009
Feedback





Home Category_List Copyright Feedback About Us Help/FAQ NZ Tax Calculators