Volume: 29, Issue: 03 (2017)
BR Pub 17/03: Goods and Services Tax - traffic enforcement activities by local authorities - GST output tax on infringement fees retained - treatment of fines - GST input tax on acquisition of goods and services
Description: The Arrangement concerns local authority traffic law enforcement activities under the Land Transport Act 1998 Updated:
Reference:
2017_29_03_001
Feedback
|
Commentary on Public Ruling BR Pub 17/03
Description: This commentary is not a legally binding statement. The commentary is intended to help readers understand and apply the conclusions reached in Public Ruling BR Pub 17/03 ('the Ruling'). Updated:
Reference:
2017_29_03_002
Feedback
|
Order in Council - Minimum family tax credit threshold rises for 2017-18 tax year
Description: The income threshold for the minimum family tax credit (MFTC), which guarantees eligible low-income working families a minimum level of after-tax income, rises from $23,764 to $23,816 on 1 April 2017 Updated:
Reference:
2017_29_03_003
Feedback
|
IS 17/01: Income tax - deductibility of feasibility expenditure
Description: This interpretation statement contains guidelines that the Commissioner considers relevant in determining whether feasibility expenditure is deductible under the general deductibility provisions in s DA 1. The statement applies where, having regard to the nature of the taxpayer's business, feasibility expenditure of the type in question is incurred as an ordinary incident of business and is recurrent in nature. Other feasibility expenditure (for example, expenditure associated with a one-off capital expansion or acquisition) is not covered by the statement. Ordinary deductibility principles should be applied to these situations to determine whether the general permission and capital limitation apply. Updated:
Reference:
2017_29_03_004
Feedback
|
Minor amendment made to Standard Practice Statement 16/01 Requests to amend assessments
Description: Under s 113 of the Tax Administration Act 1994 (the TAA), errors are generally required to be corrected in the return period in which they arose. However, s 113A of the TAA allows taxpayers to correct minor errors made in income tax returns (including RWT and NRWT), FBT returns or GST returns in the next return that is due after the discovery of the error Updated:
Reference:
2017_29_03_005
Feedback
|
Determination FDR 2016/07: Use of fair dividend rate method for a type of attributing interest in a foreign investment fund
Description: This determination applies to an attributing interest in a FIF, being a direct income interest in K2. This is a type of attributing interest for which the investor may use the fair dividend rate method to calculate FIF income from the interest. Updated:
Reference:
2017_29_03_006
Feedback
|
Legislation and determinations |
2017 International tax disclosure exemption ITR28
Description: Section 61 of the Tax Administration Act 1994 ('TAA') requires taxpayers to disclose interests in foreign entities. Section 61(1) of the TAA states that a person who has a control or income interest in a foreign company or an attributing interest in a foreign investment fund ('FIF') at any time during the income year must disclose the interest held. In the case of partnerships, disclosure needs to be made by the individual partners in the partnership. The partnership itself is not required to disclose
Categories:
FOREIGN INVESTMENT FUND (FIF)
INTEREST
INTERNATIONAL TAX DISCLOSURE EXEMPTION
Legislation: Updated: 11 / 09 / 2020
Reference:
2017_29_03_007
Feedback
|
Legal Descisions - Case Notes |
Unsuccessful application to set aside statutory demand after taxpayer's breach of binding agreement with the Commissioner regarding tax debt
Description: Elementary Solutions Ltd ('the applicant') was unsuccessful in its application to set aside the Commissioner of Inland Revenue's ('the Commissioner') statutory demand for unpaid taxes. The Court held that the parties had reached a binding agreement, where the Commissioner would not pursue the debt pending the outcome of a separate defamation proceeding. The Court held that an essential term of the agreement was that for the next 12 months the applicant and its director meet their ongoing tax obligations. When they failed to do so, the Court held that the Commissioner was entitled to cancel the agreement and pursue recovery of the applicant's tax debt.
Categories:
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ARRANGEMENT
DEBT RECOVERY
Referenced Entities:
Updated: 11 / 09 / 2020
Reference:
2017_29_03_008
Feedback
|