Kwister Logo - Tax information at your fingertips

Volume: 30, Issue: 06 (2018)

Current Time (NZ)
Fri 22 Nov 00:17 AM

Stats: Volumes: 8, Issues: 76, Articles: 1421  


Year: 2018, Volume 30, Issue: 06
Find PDF/full article
Previous issue     Next issue  

Correction - Tax Information Bulletin Vol 30 No 5 June 2018
 
Description: The Measures to encourage provision of IRD numbers item, published in Tax Information Bulletin Vol 30 No 5, contained an error on page 34 under the heading Joint investors IRD numbers.

Categories: REGISTRATION 

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_001
Feedback

Taxation (new due date for new and increased assessments) commencement order 2018
 
Description: This commencement order sets 18 June 2018 as the date that section 142AB of the Tax Administration Act 1994 comes into force for goods and services tax.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_002
Feedback

QB 18/09: Income tax - can sharemilkers and contract milkers deduct farmhouse expenditure using the approach in IS 17/02?
 
Description: The Commissioners view on the appropriate treatment of farmhouse expenses in different circumstances is set out in interpretation statement "IS 17/02: Income tax - deductibility of farmhouse expenses". This item clarifies that sharemilkers and contract milkers (subject to meeting the requirements) can use the approach in the interpretation statement to claim a 20% deduction for farmhouse expenditure without the need to calculate actual business use.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_003
Feedback

Determination FDR 2018/01: A type of attributing interest in a foreign investment fund for which a person may not use the fair dividend rate method
 
Description: Any investment made by a New Zealand resident investor in the NZDH-A class of shares in the Global High Yield Fund, a sub-fund of Russell Investment Company plc, is a type of attributing interest for which a person may not use the fair dividend rate method to calculate foreign investment fund income from the interest for the 2019 and subsequent years.

Updated: 01 / 07 / 2019
Reference: 
2018_30_06_004
Feedback

National average market values of specified livestock determination 2018
 
Description: This determination sets the national average market values to apply to specified livestock on hand at the end of the 2017-2018 income year.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_005
Feedback

Determination: amount of a particular schedular payment (being per diem allowances paid in the screen production industry) that shall be regarded as expenditure incurred in production of payment
 
Description: This Determination sets out the amount regarded as expenditure incurred in the production of particular schedular payments when those payments are per diem allowances paid to resident and non-resident contractors and resident and non-resident entertainers working in the screen production industry in New Zealand.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_006
Feedback

Family Dispute Resolution Act Mediated Agreement Not Privileged/Confidential
 
Description: The Appellant appealed the High Court judgment which found that an agreement produced through mediation ('the Mediated Agreement') under the Family Disputes Resolution Act 2013 was not privileged and/or confidential, and was therefore available for the Commissioner to use when making an assessment under the Child Support Act ('the CSA'). The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the Mediated Agreement was not privileged or confidential, allowing the Commissioner to rely on that document as proof of parentage when making a CSA assessment.

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_007
Feedback

Commissioner Not Entitled to Costs for In-House Counsel Appearing in High Court
 
Description: The Commissioner of Inland Revenue ('the Commissioner') failed in her application for 2B costs on a liquidation proceeding on the basis that the Commissioner had not incurred costs in the sense contemplated by part 14 of the High Court Rules 2016.

Categories: COSTS  HIGH COURT  LIQUIDATION 

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_008
Feedback

Court of Appeal Quashes Limited Order for Discovery
 
Description: The Court of Appeal has quashed the limited order for discovery made in the High Court after the Appellant and Respondent came to an agreed resolution that Woolford J's decision in the High Court was wrong. Therefore the parties asked the Court of Appeal to make orders by consent allowing the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue.

Categories: HIGH COURT 

Updated: 
Reference: 
2018_30_06_009
Feedback





Home Category_List Copyright Feedback About Us Help/FAQ NZ Tax Calculators